Graham Austin - Artist’s Statement
01 Jun 2009
Artist's Statements and News at Taylor Galleries

Graham Austin - Artist’s Statement

 

Briefly, I paint in spots [a pointillist style] searching to capture the spirit of the aerial landscape, whilst capturing a cartographic expression of spotted abstraction. Some of my works include an horizon line and a sense of perspective. Initially, I was trained with traditional values and an appreciation for the importance of good drawing as the foundation structure.

 

Close up, much of my work appears as spotted abstraction, from a distance the fusion of colour and shapes unveil the solid drawing structure hidden beneath the abstraction.   My website shows work available for purchase and mainly unseen recent pieces.   No works produced prior to 1988 are reproduced on this website. There are variations in style representing trends in development.

 

I have, however, been painting in my spotillist style since 1972. Although, for about three or four years, encompassing my painting expeditions in the Kimberley, I discarded the spotillist approach, which was quite an extraordinary decision because  the Kimberley seems to have a spotted texture of its own, and because of its harshness, I believe it particularly lends itself to my style.

 

I have generally returned to my spotted technique painting acrylics and watercolour to express the sense of spirituality I glean from the great outback.

 

I see the Australian landscape as a rugged sculpture, enhanced with a strong sense of spirituality and swathed in a harsh, varying light that generates its own visual poetry, at times drama. I like to paint that poetry of visual repetition and monotony where you have to take time out, smelling it, studying its perspective and feeling the vast aura of its natural presence.

 

The Australian landscape tells me it is holy ground, akin to an open-air cathedral. Out there I feel the presence of God's omnipotence.

 

The Beginning

I first became interested in art and becoming an artist at a very early age. The oldest report goes back to when I was in a cot, crying. My grandfather told me he said to my mother, “Give him a pencil and paper, that always shuts them up”. He claimed I drew the joining of two walls and the ceiling plus the light hanging from the ceiling. That was his story and I am sticking with it.

 

At school I was always drawing. Classmates were always asking me to draw in their books for them, or they would want to copy my drawings. When I was attending high school my father said, “If you go well in your school work I wíll send you to art classes, if not it will be coaching college”. I was destined to coaching college where I fascinated the tutors with drawings and cartoons which they always confiscated.  Somehow they taught me algebra and trigonometry, and consequently, passed my exams then, promptly forgot those subjects on leaving school.   Drawing has always been an important element in my painting because it was my drawing skills as a child that had others declaring me as an artist.

 

My work has been subconsciously influenced from my first time in the air. It was a seaplane joy flight whilst on holidays down the south coast of NSW as a seven year old. The remembered images were quite astounding.  I saw the landscape made up with spots, dots and dashes. Rolling surf looked like cotton wool rolled into stringy strips. Trees were spots, there was a sense of  primitive design to the landscape. I was caught up in the youthful exuberance of taking off from a small lake, experiencing the giddy excitement of a first time adventure in the air, absorbed in wonderment and then thrilled with the pilot’s skill in landing the craft back onto the small lake. On one of his flights we witnessed a misjudgment where the pilot overshot the lake whilst landing and slid from the water up onto the sand. Unsurpassed excitement for me as a child but also with a sense of relief it didn’t happen on my flight.

 

In later years, driving around Oberon in the Blue Mountains and looking down into the valley, my childhood flight experience was rekindled. I started painting elevated views.  I discovered working from photographs was generally quite inhibiting.   The camera doesn’t capture the soul of the landscape and it ignores that emanating spirit whereas, memory and imagination does.

 

That same spirit emerges from your work when you paint according to the logic of the landscape and in particular, your emotional feel of the landscape’s creation.   I feel I have to understand how the ground surface is washed and blown by nature, creating the earth’s wrinkles and suggesting its subjective, emotional response.   In my case, by incorporating a gallimaufry of spots with a sense of organised chaos.   Oddly enough, when spots are not placed in the right places the picture looks incredibly wrong, the rules of perspective cannot be ignored.

 

The main influences on me as an artist now are the marvellous effects of aerial landscape and the sense of spirit emanating from the landscape patterns, that conjointly, emanates from the spirit. I paint in spots, in a style akin to the pointillists but I am more interested in creating a spotted abstraction on close inspection, that fuses into reality when viewed from a distance.

 

The main themes and subjects of my artworks are mostly the abstracted creation of landscape where water and wind carve the design, sculpting the moving surface.   I like the sense of rocks and trees becoming spots, sometimes standing alone and sometimes gathering in groups just like people, intermingling in life and becoming a tide of movement, a current of aerially viewed patterns juxtaposed in perspective.   My process of determining stages of development when creating an artwork are mostly cerebral, working directly from my brain straight to the painting surface. I rarely do preliminary sketches. I like to visualise the subject in my mind, then paint direct.  I remain flexible with the original idea, grabbing at any possible opportunity created by mistakes. This mode of operation or approach was developed from the fluidity involved when working in watercolour.   When I am exhibiting my work I feel the real opportunity to compare my painting against others. I can assess my feelings, the sense of landscape spirit and perception of quality. I have no problem with personal exposure of my work. I naturally enjoy adulation and usually weigh up negative and/or critical response after my own self-assessment and follow my own beliefs.

 

My work routine is constant, whether on the painting surface or in my head. The most frustrating times are when caught in a famine for ideas or energy lapse.   The old saying, ideas can come in the shower is true. It doesn’t matter where you are when the ideas come as long as they are there.

 

I have camped out in the Kimberley on three occasions, three weeks at a time. There the landscape seems to be more consciously a sea of spots and has therefore made an indelible impression on me. The Kimberley also has a greater sense of spirituality than many other places.   Whether it is aboriginal spirit released from the landscape or vice versa I do not know.   What I do know is I was in one of the greatest cathedrals in the world, never alone, almost living in another dimension.   Most of my influences have emerged from the harsh Australian landscape.  I have been to Fiji, England, Italy, France, Singapore and Bali but none feel to me like the Australian landscape spirit. The symbols of landscape, or painters’ marks representing landscape objects is always worth observing. Some artists don’t particularly use any symbols. My preference is using abstract marks, spots and shapes that combined, form the whole.

 

Do I paint like anyone else?

When one of my very early paintings was mistaken for the work of a tutor, I was mortified.  I started questioning the origins of technique and decided I wasn't going to paint like anyone else again. I now talk about the quest that led me to the discovery of the process I call "landscapes determined by fate".   Do I really paint like anyone else?  I confronted myself with this question early in my career, whilst a student at the National Art School, East Sydney Technical College.

 

It seemed I had a natural affinity with watercolour and acrylics.   I was particularly impressed with the talent of one of my tutors at that time.   During a session of constructive criticism my eyes were opened to "signature style", that is, a style recognisably one's own. The prominent artist conducting the constructive criticism left my painting until last and then said "Well Brian, I don't know how you do it". He thought my work was painted by another artist he respected and gushed with praise and admiration. Up until then, it had been the best painting I had ever done and I was proud of it.   Brian announced it was not his work but that of one of his students, pointing to me. The gushing praise was then directed to me for simply learning the lessons well. In another sense, I was an imitator not an inspirator. I was painting my versions of his style.

 

I was embarrassed. but also aware of the quotation, "99% of most art is imitation, 1% is innovation".  I didn't even feel that my subconscious imitation of Brian's style was as good as his, even though it did bear a resemblance. I had obviously been influenced by his work, his problem-solving approach, technique and style. As everyone present on that occasion patted me on the back, adding to the praise, I was thinking, "How am I going to solve painting problems my way?" and,   "How can I make my paintings look like they were painted by me? “  

 

Change was going to be tough because that painting also won me my second art prize. That was 1964. I said to myself, now is the time to paint like me but unfortunately, I didn’t know how to paint like me. I didn’t know what a Graham Austin painting should look like. I realised though, it was something I had to develop.  

 

Graham Austin’s Shock of the New

At that time I was painting traditional landscapes. The following weekend I headed bush, sat in the middle of a dry creek bed, confronted by a subject I was willing to attempt. I decided my approach to the subject was going to be different from the style to which I was accustomed.   Before this fateful day I would spend hours drawing and observing. Carefully, I would mentally note details, the change of light and mood. I would then spend several months digesting all this information in my mind, thinking my way through the painting, not even lifting a brush.  Then, with my energies in place I would pluck up the courage to add colour and tone to bring the drawing to life. I guess it was like colouring in. That approach obviously worked however, this time I was not going to spend hours drawing with a pencil.

 

In the middle of this dry creek bed, I attacked my virginal white paper with washes of colour and tone, quickly trying to capture the subject and mood without any pencil drawing or lengthy period of observation involved. I worked directly with richly stained water and watercolour brush, not a hint of pencil outline. I had taken the first step to paint like Graham Austin. I also discovered that painting is drawing and drawing is painting. Good painting relies on good drawing skills. I had taken my first bold step in a new direction but I still had a long way to go. Even today, I feel I haven't progressed to my final destination. I have no idea where it will be but I will not fall into the trap of following fashionable trends.

 

My dry creek bed painting gave me some encouragement because it earned me a Highly Commended. Not first prize but, more importantly, I liked what I had done. I always feel art prizes are like lotteries, for no other reason than subjectivity. You can't be all things to all judges. But art prizes are nice to win, it says one of my peers liked my work. 

 

Expressing individuality

I never kept a record of the dry creek bed painting and my memory tells me it was probably not too different in style to any other traditional painting I had done before. The journey, however, was shorter. My observation skills had quickened and retrospectively I can see I had begun to search for my own style.

 

The fact that nobody else paints like me or, more particularly, I don't paint like anyone else delights me. It means I am expressing my individuality. Whether others like my work or not doesn't matter either.   It is nice if they do and very flattering, but I emphasise the point, I am painting in my own style which, incidentally, keeps evolving because of life's various influences. This suggests to me I am reflecting life's hiccups and flows through my painting style.  

 

Finding the perfect tool

Another turning point for my painting style and individuality came from that often considered and repeated tip,   "Use a larger brush than you really think necessary because it will stop you from fiddling".  I discovered a stippling brush with the brush area measuring approximately 20 x 15cm that allows me to dab at the work creating stippled spots. Changing the angle of the brush generates wonderful textures, changing colours offers extraordinary visual effects.

 

Although I originally trained as a traditional painter I have ventured off into total abstraction and returned to subject matter, backwards and forward, at various times of total abstraction, producing works I felt were visual interpretations of music.

 

For many years I have enjoyed the abstracted rhythms and patterns of aerial landscape. I became fascinated by the design and patterns before me. A spotting technique suited my direction, subconsciously embedded as a seven year old during a seaplane joy flight. I saw the landscape made up with spots, dots and dashes. I began to think of the surrounding atmosphere, with or without mist, being made up with spots and dots. I began to think of everything and everyone being made up with atoms.

 

It is here I must mention my beginnings, I was adopted. My original birth certificate states my birth mother’s name. My father’s name is omitted, just a diagonal line.  I have searched unsuccessfully for information and wondered if I have aboriginal blood because of my empathy and admiration for their culture. Whether I have a percentage of aboriginal background or not doesn’t matter, either way is good. I like to think that long before aboriginal culture was fashionable I was seeing Australian landscape with their influence, of landscape having spirit and that spirit strangely being landscape.

 

I see the Australian landscape as hard, harsh and unforgiving, not necessarily always poetic. I fully appreciate the aboriginal use of spots while admiring the values of western art. Sometimes my work is interpreted as a mix of both. It has also been mused that I step in each value, which may suggest there are variations. I enjoy the visual fusion of complimentary and tertiary coloured spots fusing to make new colours and forming abstracted spaces. The more abstracted my work is the more it is strangely recognisable, therefor the more I feel I have been successful. I don't necessarily use the stippling effect for all spotted marks. I often use any favourite old brush that will make spots. I also use a flat brush for laying down some overall washes or painted shapes, particularly in my watercolours. Sometimes I use wet, juicy, flowing colour that generates worries for me as the picture dries. At other times I limit the amount of juice or even work a combination of sloshy, wash spots. Usually I have a firm idea of what I am going to paint but at times I don't, relying on the feeling of landscape and leaving destiny to imagination, chance and search in the early stages of a picture.

 

Often the weather can influence the end result of a painting because of fast or slow drying. It is all part of the exciting challenge. The real magic I believe, is when the right side of the brain has total command. That is when I can reach into my subconscious mind with a grasped idea and channel energy through my heart. From there the energy is extended spontaneously along my arm, off the brush onto the paper or canvas under a watchful eye. This may all sound rather romantic or far-fetched. Unexpectedly, when the brain, the hand and the elements work together in harmony, unison results and the effort is most rewarding. When I am in the right side of my brain there seems to be a oneness, reflecting a loss of awareness to logic per se but the subject naturally falls into place, somehow. On other occasions, resolving a painting is nothing but struggle and hard work.

 

Making Watercolour Magic

When I start painting a watercolour I begin with a wet sponge of clean or murky water and I drag it across the paper leaving transparent landscape marks, This is the beginning of drawing. I leave the sky area dry. If there is to be a significant landscape shape like a mountain, I draw it as a wet mass with the sponge of water. Now comes the exciting part when I introduce the fat stippling brush loaded with colour. Adrenalin is rushing and I feel like a magician as colour touches the wet paper and runs. The painting starts to take form and it is all immediate as the initial wash appears.

 

Good things and problems appear simultaneously.  It is all very exciting as colour creeps into wet sections and the picture keeps changing. The wet edge moves like a mini flood. I try to resist the urge to fiddle but attempt to end major disasters. No matter what, I generally consider the first wash my first mistake and a suggestion of the end result. Hopefully, It is time to make corrections, enhance the good effects and convert this free, sloppy wash into a recognisable landform.   My painting approach is something of a parallel to what happens when nature creates the real thing. Every rainfall is a sloppy wash, shifting and shaping the landscape, creating ridges and rivulets.  I have to have faith in my own talent, remain flexible in my thinking, taking advantage of natural mistakes and turn them into opportunities. I have to make magic, use my imagination while searching for the landscape in my creation. I rather like one of the late Lloyd Rees' comments when he said, "I have to confess that I simply do not care how a picture is produced - it is the result that matters". I therefore prefer to have the subject taking control, not the technique.

 






Proudly supported by ARTnews.com.au.